Homosexuality & homophobia
Posted: April 19th, 2006, 12:49 pm
This morning, I read a story at MSNBC reporting that the US Supreme Court has chosen not to hear a case presented by Jerry Falwell concerning his dispute with a website whose domain name is (undoubtedly intentionally) very similar to his own (fallwell.com vs. falwell.com) but whose perspective on homosexuality is diametrically different. I presume that Reverend Falwell's argument with the website is generated by his abhorrence of homosexuality and his conviction that it is a sin. The website in dispute is called Unworthy of God's Love; the URL is www.fallwell.com.
Falwell and others who share his view argue that the Bible forbids homosexuality. The most frequently quoted passages are Leviticus 18:22 ("You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.") and Leviticus 20:13 ("If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.").
As I see it, the problem with relying on Leviticus as an argument against homosexuality is that Leviticus consists of twenty-seven chapters publishing a long set of assorted thou-shalts and thou-shalt-nots, forbidding all kinds of activities, from eating shellfish and pork to shaving, planting different crops on the same field, having tattoos, working on the tenth day of the seventh month, and on and on. In my experience, virtually all of these are dismissed as no longer relevant by those who nonetheless insist on the continued inviolability and application of verses 18:22 and 20:13. That kind of "cherry picking" (to borrow a term currently in favor) has always seemed to me to be somewhat shaky logic.
My own sense, as I have written before (at TZF’s Letters where scroll down the menu to "homophobia", and in this forum at the thread John Paul II), is that homophobia -- like many hatreds and phobias -- is not about what it seems to be about, in this instance homosexuality, but about ignorance of our True Nature. That is, once we focus our gaze on what really matters, and Remember who and what we are in Truth, all discriminatory mindsets dissolve away. And as for the sexuality of homosexuality specifically, I do not see how it makes any difference whether the question is about homosexuality or heterosexuality. Whichever it is, I believe that the observations and conclusions in our article Do We Have To Give Up Sex? apply.
Falwell and others who share his view argue that the Bible forbids homosexuality. The most frequently quoted passages are Leviticus 18:22 ("You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.") and Leviticus 20:13 ("If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.").
As I see it, the problem with relying on Leviticus as an argument against homosexuality is that Leviticus consists of twenty-seven chapters publishing a long set of assorted thou-shalts and thou-shalt-nots, forbidding all kinds of activities, from eating shellfish and pork to shaving, planting different crops on the same field, having tattoos, working on the tenth day of the seventh month, and on and on. In my experience, virtually all of these are dismissed as no longer relevant by those who nonetheless insist on the continued inviolability and application of verses 18:22 and 20:13. That kind of "cherry picking" (to borrow a term currently in favor) has always seemed to me to be somewhat shaky logic.
My own sense, as I have written before (at TZF’s Letters where scroll down the menu to "homophobia", and in this forum at the thread John Paul II), is that homophobia -- like many hatreds and phobias -- is not about what it seems to be about, in this instance homosexuality, but about ignorance of our True Nature. That is, once we focus our gaze on what really matters, and Remember who and what we are in Truth, all discriminatory mindsets dissolve away. And as for the sexuality of homosexuality specifically, I do not see how it makes any difference whether the question is about homosexuality or heterosexuality. Whichever it is, I believe that the observations and conclusions in our article Do We Have To Give Up Sex? apply.